Document Type : Original Research Manuscripts


Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.


Research in second language learning has identified the absence of metacognition awareness among learners as one of the major problems contributing to students' inability to develop reading skills. This mixed-method study sought to investigate the impact of metacognitive awareness raising via explicit reading strategy instruction in a flipped instructional environment on Iranian EFL learners' reading skills. To this end, a sample of 56 EFL learners at the pre-intermediate level (28 in the treatment group and 28 in the control group) who were selected based on convenient sampling from one of the private language institutes in Kerman, Iran, participated in the study. Data werecollected using the Oxford placement test, a reading pre-test, a post-test, and a semi-structured interview. The findings revealed that EFL learners in the treatment group outperformed the control group in reading comprehension from the pre-test to the post-test. The results of the semi-structured interview confirmed the results of the t-test, and it was concluded that the learners were satisfied with the treatment due to its cooperative, fun, and informative nature. The participants, even though they mentioned some negative points such as the unavailability of the instructor and wasting time on both methods and unimportant details, reported on the effective role of both flipped context and the strategy itself. In sum, the results confirmed that integrating flipped classrooms with metacognitive development increased EFL learners' reading comprehension.


Main Subjects

Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies on ESP reading comprehension in academic settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature7(4), 77-86.
Akbarzadeh, M., Tajadini, M., & Haddad Narafshan, M. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness Instruction: A Mixed Method Study on High School EFL Learners' Writing Development. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones8(3), 1-11.
Al-Jarrah, T. M., Mansor, N., Rashid, R. A., Bashir, I., & Al-Jarrah, J. M. (2018). EFL Students' Attitude toward Using Metacognitive Strategies in Writing. English Language Teaching11(10), 162-171.
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning. Washington DC: ERIC Digest.
Anderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of language learning. In Psychology for language learning (pp. 169-187). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education128, 269-283.
Azizoğlu, N. İ., & Okur, A. (2020). The Relationship Between Metacognitive Awareness Of Reading Strategies and Demographic Variables, Circadian Rhythm Characteristics Among University Students. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(2), 258-269.
Batang, B. L. (2015). Metacognitive strategy awareness and reading comprehension of prospective pre-service secondary teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research3(4), 62-67.
Bossaer, J. B., Panus, P., Stewart, D. W., Hagemeier, N. E., & George, J. (2016). Student performance in a pharmacotherapy oncology module before and after flipping the classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 1-6.
ÇAKICI, D. (2015). Autonomy in language teaching and learning process. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi16(1), 31-42.
Caner, M. (2012). The definition of blended learning in higher education. In P. Anastasiades (Ed.), Blended learning environments for adults: Evaluations and frameworks (pp. 19–34). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Carneiro, R. (2007). The big picture: Understanding learning and meta-learning challenges. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 151–172.
Chamot, A. U. (2014). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 25-43). Routledge.
Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-338.
Chiang, T. H. C. (2017). Analysis of learning behavior in a flipped programing classroom adopting problem-solving strategies. Interactive Learning Environments25(2), 189-202.
Chumworatayee, T. (2017). The Effect of Reading Strategy Instruction on Thai EFL Adult Learners' Reading Strategy Awareness. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network10(1), 135-148.
Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cornford, I. R. (2002). Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(4), 357–368.
Day, L. J. (2018). A gross anatomy flipped classroom effects performance, retention, and higher‐level thinking in lower performing students. Anatomical sciences education11(6), 565-574.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230–248.
Dörnyei. Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.
Fathi, J., & Afzali, M. (2020). The Effect of Second Language Reading Strategy Instruction on Young Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction13(1), 475-488.
Fitrisia, D., Tan, K. E., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students' performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education30(1), 15-30.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist34(10), 906.
Fleming, K., & Panizzon, D. (2010). Facilitating students' ownership of learning in science by developing lifelong learning skills. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(3), 27–32.
Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC journal39(2), 188-213.
Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2010). Developing reading fluency and comprehension using repeated reading: Evidence from longitudinal student reports. Language Teaching Research14(1), 27-59.
Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 17–32). Dordrecht: Springer.
Graham, S., & R. Harris, K. (2000). The role of self- regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational psychologist35(1), 3-12.
Härmälä, M., & Barkhanajyan, A. (2018). L2 students’ language-related difficulties in subject classes. Revue francaise de linguistique appliquee, (2), 45-58.
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 33–68). Dordrecht: Springer.
Jiang, J. (2022). Chinese University Students' Metacognitive Strategy Use in Language Acquisition: A Flipped Learning Perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL)14(1), 1-16.
Kansızoğlu, H. B., & Cömert, Ö. B. (2021). The effect of teaching writing based on flipped classroom model on metacognitive writing awareness and writing achievements of middle-school students. Egitim ve Bilim46(205).
Karbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura16(28), 5-14.
Kassaian, Z., & Ghadiri, M. (2011). An Investigation of the Relationship between Motivation and Metacognitive Awareness Strategies in Listening Comprehension: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching & Research2(5), 19-37.
Klapwijk, N. M. (2015). EMC2= comprehension: A reading strategy instruction framework for all teachers. South African Journal of Education35(1), 1-10.
Koukourikou, M., Manoli, P., & Griva, E. (2018). Explicit collaborative reading strategy instruction: A pilot intervention in the EFL context. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning9(1), 195-210.
Lazăr, A. (2013). Learner autonomy and its implementation for language teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences76, 460-464.
Maftoon, P., Birjandi, P., & Farahian, M. (2014). Investigating Iranian EFL learners' writing metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Research Studies in Education3(5), 37-51.
Manoli, P. G. (2018). Developing reading strategies in elementary EFL classrooms. University of Thessaly.
Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2021). The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners' listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 1-35.
Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., Hall, N. C., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Metacognitive strategies and test performance: An experience sampling analysis of students' learning behavior. Education Research International3(1), 21-32.
O'Bryan, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2009). Using a mixed methods approach to explore strategies, metacognitive awareness and the effects of task design on listening development. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics12(1), 9-38.
Ohata, K., & Fukao, A. (2014). L2 learners' conceptions of academic reading and themselves as academic readers. System, 42, 81-92.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Öz, H. (2007). Understanding metacognitive knowledge of Turkish EFL students in secondary Education. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 1(2), 53-83.
Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues8(2), 98-105.
Par, L. (2020). The relationship between reading strategies and reading achievement of the EFL students. International Journal of Instruction13(2), 223-238.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into practice41(4), 219-225.
Rican, S. J. (2015). Metacognitive strategies: Asset to efficient learning and education. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal5(1), 31-39.
Sahmadan, S., & Ajam, A. (2020). Investigating Learners' obstacles in second language reading comprehension. Journal Bilingual, 10(2), 1-8.
Shih, H. C. J., & Huang, S. H. C. (2020). College students' metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning33(7), 755-784.
Shyr, W. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students' self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 53–62.
Stebner, F., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2018). Förderung des Transfers metaognitiver Lernstrategien durch direktes und indirektes Training [Fostering transfer of metacognitive skills through direct and indirecttraining]. Unterrichtswissenschaft46, 409–435.
Sugiharto, B., Corebima, A. D., & Susilo, H. (2018, June). A comparison of types of knowledge of cognition of preservice biology teachers. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 1-16.
Suhono, S. (2019). Providing explicit strategy instruction to enhance students' reading comprehension at English for Islamic studies class. Jurnal smart5(2), 81-93.
Sun, L. (2013). The effect of meta-cognitive learning strategies on English learning. Theory and practice in Language studies3(11), 29-45.
Tabeei, S. N., Tabrizi, A. R., & Ahmadi, G. (2013). The effect of metacognitive strategies instruction on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners: Focusing on gender. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World4(4), 13-29.
Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners' reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal13(1), 275-320.
Tamin, İ. B., & Büyükahıska, D. (2020). Reading Strategy Instruction on Metacognitive Awareness: The Case of Turkish High School Students. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal20(2), 82-97.
Tercanlioglu, L., & Demiröz, H. (2015). Goal orientation and reading strategy use of Turkish students of an English language teaching department. The Qualitative Report20(3), 286.
Toprak, T. E., & Cakir, A. (2021). Examining the L2 reading comprehension ability of adult ELLs: Developing a diagnostic test within the cognitive diagnostic assessment framework. Language Testing38(1), 106-131.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.
Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE—Life Sciences Education14(3), ar26.
Viswanathan, M., & Childers, T. L. (2003). An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words. Perceptual and motor skills96(1), 267-287.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all. Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 331-370.
Yilmaz, R. M., & Baydas, O. (2017). An examination of undergraduates' metacognitive strategies in pre-class asynchronous activity in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development65(6), 1547-1567.
Zhang, Y., Chen, B. L., Ge, J., Hung, C. Y., & Mei, L. (2019). When is the best time to use rubrics in flipped learning? A study on students' learning achievement, metacognitive awareness, and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments27(8), 1207-1221.
Zhou, Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching8(2), 471-495.
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 229–242). Oxon: