International Journal of Knowledge Processing Studies
Online ISSN: 2783-4611

Fifth Generation University Data-Based Model in Islamic Azad University

Document Type : Original Research Manuscripts

Authors

Nasim Bakhshaei 1
Mohammad Reza Bagherzadeh 2
Yusuf Gholipourkanani 3
Mohammad Reza Dalvi 4

1 PhD student in Public administration,comparative management and development Qaemshahr Branch,Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr,Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor ,Department of Managemen, Qaemshahr Branch,Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr,Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor Department of Industrial Engineering, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad university, Qaemshahr, Iran

4 Department of Management,Dehaghan Branch,Islamic Azad University ,Dehaghan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/kps.2023.389983.1115
Abstract
This research aims to develop a data-based model for fifth-generation universities. Creating a data-driven model in a university environment is essential in education. The primary mission of higher education is to address the specific educational needs of individuals, as well as the needs of society and its economic development. The study was conducted in both qualitative and quantitative sections. The grounded theory is conducted based on the perspectives of the chancellors of Islamic Azad University. 21 people were selected using snowball sampling techniques. In the following, a six-category model is provided. Analysis was done using NVIVO software. The statistical population in the quantitative section consisted of all professors from Islamic Azad University nationwide. A sample size of 381 professors was selected using the Cochran sampling formula. The research tool was a questionnaire created by the researcher. Then, using the model presented and the suggested pattern fit, the performance of the model is predicted based on the K-Mean method in Weka and RapidMiner software. According to the results, the proposed model was approved by experts. The analysis of structural equations was also confirmed. According to the Waode algorithm model, the highest accuracy was 81%.

Keywords

Fifth Generation University
Data-Based Model
Educational Data Mining
Subjects
  1. Ahmad, M., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2022). Automatic content analysis of asynchronous discussion forum transcripts: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11355-11410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11065-w
  2. Ballantine, J. H., Stuber, J., & Everitt, J. G. (2021). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023715 ‏
  3. Bangkara, B. A., Fatmawati, E., Siregar, M. T., Wirawan, V., & Wisman, W. (2022). Managing Higher Education in Pandemic Era in the Challenge of Education Quality and Equity. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 120-138. org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.2068
  4. Barron, G. R. (2022). How university rankings are made through globally coordinated action: a transnational institutional ethnography in the sociology of quantification. Higher Education, 1-18. org/10.1007/s10734-022-00903-y
  5. El-Tawy, N., & Abdel-Kader, M. (2022). Higher education challenges: accounting and finance academia in a research-led teaching universities. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2020-0007
  6. Etuk, G. K. (2015). Innovations in Nigerian Universities: Perspectives of an Insider from a" Fourth Generation" University. International journal of higher education, 4(3), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n3p218
  7. Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2022). Challenge Based Learning: Recommendations for the Future of Higher Education. In The Emerald Handbook of Challenge Based Learning(pp. 391-411). Emerald Publishing Limited. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-490-920221018
  8. Gopinath, R., & Poornappriya, T. S. (2022). Opportunities and Challenges in Indian Higher Education Due to Corona Crises. ‏
  9. Hatim L. Hassan K. Gianluca D. (2022). Analytics of learning tactics and strategies in an online learner sourcing environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39: 94-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12729
  10. Hilliger, I. Camila A. Constanza M. Sergio C.  Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, (2022). Lessons learned from designing a curriculum analytics tool for improving student learning and program quality. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 3: 633-657.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09315-4
  11. Huerta, C. M., Atahua, A. S., Guerrero, J. V., & Andrade-Arenas, L. (2023). Data mining: Application of digital marketing in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 621-629. doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.011
  12. Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2022). The Contribution of Higher Education to Sustainability: The Development and Assessment of Sustainability Competences in a University Case Study. Education Sciences, 12(6), 406. doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060406
  13. Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social Change-Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004
  14. Kukharska, L. (2022). QUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICE IN UKRAINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: CHALLENGE-RESULT PARADIGM. Collection of scientific papers «ΛΌГOΣ», (August 12, 2022; Zurich, Switzerland), 142-146. doi.org/10.36074/logos-12.08.2022.43
  15. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2022). Short-term, short-changed? A temporal perspective on the implications of academic casualization for teaching in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 27(6), 756-771. ‏ org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1742681
  16. Lezhnina, O., & Kismihók, G. (2022). Combining statistical and machine learning methods to explore German students’ attitudes towards ICT in PISA. International journal of research & method in education, 45(2), 180-199. org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1963226
  17. Llerena-Izquierdo, J., Rodriguez, M. E., & Guerrero-Roldán, A. E. (2023). Monitoring and Adaptation of Assessment Activities in a VLE Supported by Learning Analytic. In Intelligent Technologies: Design and Applications for Society: Proceedings of CITIS 2022 (pp. 409-419). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24327-1_35
  18. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017). New functions of universities in century XXI towards “fourth generation” universities.  edu, 9. ‏
  19. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness: 'fourth generation 'universities. Available at SSRN 3022717. ‏ https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3022717
  20. Martin, F., Sun, T., Westine, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2022). Examining research on the impact of distance and online learning: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 100438. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100438
  21. Mateos-Ronco, A. (2022). Redesigning methodologies in remote learning in higher education: challenges and results. In INTED2022 Proceedings(pp. 7535-7540). IATED. ‏ https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.1911
  22. Mei, W., & Symaco, L. (2022). University-wide entrepreneurship education in China’s higher education institutions: issues and challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 177-193. org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1735330 ‏
  23. Nagy, S., & Veresne Somosi, M. (2020). Students' Perceptions of Sustainable Universities in Hungary: An Importance-Performance Analysis. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(54), 496-515. org/10.24818/EA/2020/54/496
  24. Núñez-Canal, M., de Obesso, M. D. L. M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121270.
  25. O’Connor, K. (2022). Constructivism, curriculum and the knowledge question: tensions and challenges for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 412-422. org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585
  26. Ogunsanya, O. F. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of community engagement initiatives in Universities of Technology in South Africa(Doctoral dissertation). ‏
  27. Pechter, K. (2022). A Retrospective on the University–Industry Innovation Nexus in Japan: Empirical Assessment of Co-authorship in the Light of New Data. In Systems Research II: Essays in Honor of Yasuhiko Takahara on Systems Management Theory and Practice (pp. 21-51). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9941-2_2
  28. Richard, A. Levine, P. E. Rivera, L. He, J. Marilee J. Bresciani L. (2023). A learning analytics case study: On class sizes in undergraduate writing courses, Stat, https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.527
  29. Sandu, E. A., Solomon, G., Morar, D., & Muhammad, A. S. (2014). Considerations on implementation of a social accountability management system model in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.638 ‏
  30. Saqr, M., Tuominen, V., Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Väisänen, S., & Hirsto, L. (2022). Teachers’ learning profiles in learning programming: the big picture!. In Frontiers in Education (p. 318). Frontiers. 10.3389/feduc.2022.840178,
  31. Steinle, V., Stacey, K., & Price, B. (2022). Beyond Accuracy: A Process for Analysis of Constructed Responses in Large Datasets and Insights into Students’ Equation Solving. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 32(3), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2022.32.3.201
  32. Suprijandoko, F. (2022). Building data Marts in Teaching Management: A Case Study, PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 6(3), 1-14. doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2022.63.0114
  33. Tishkina, K. O., Eliseeva, O. V., Bagautdinova, A. S., Shilova, K. S., & Efremova, A. A. (2022). Data-Based Approach to Educational Programs Quality Management. University Management: Practice and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.03.025
  34. Vilariño, F. (2022). CITIZEN SCIENCE AS A TOOL FOR CHALLENGE-BASED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION. In EDULEARN22 Proceedings (pp. 1850-1850). IATED. doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.0492
  35. Yacoub, M. F., Maghawry, H. A., Helal, N. A., Soto, S. V., & Gharib, T. F. (2022, November). An Efficient 2-Stages Classification Model for Students Performance Prediction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2022 (pp. 107-122). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  36. Zand, S., Salehi Omran, E., & Karamkhani, Z. (2022). Identifying the components of the green university in the context of the fifth-generation university paradigm. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 11(21), 53-75. doi: 10.22080/eps.2023.24677.2156
  37. Zanellati, A., Macauda, A., Panciroli, C., & Gabbrielli, M. (2023). Representation of learning in the post-digital: students’ dropout predictive models with artificial intelligence algorithms. Research on Education and Media, 15(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2023-0014
International Journal of Knowledge Processing Studies
Volume 4, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 79-90

  • Receive Date 15 March 2023
  • Revise Date 28 August 2023
  • Accept Date 27 December 2023

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us