Transnational Knowledge Processes as Drivers of Legitimacy and Credibility in State–Nation Relations: Policy Frameworks, Knowledge Actors, and Governance Requirements

Jamshidi, Sajjad; Allameh, Sayeed Mohsen; Peykani, Mehraban آadi

doi:10.22034/kps.2026.580329.1274

Transnational Knowledge Processes as Drivers of Legitimacy and Credibility in State–Nation Relations: Policy Frameworks, Knowledge Actors, and Governance Requirements

Document Type : Original Research Manuscripts

Authors

Sajjad Jamshidi ¹

Sayeed Mohsen Allameh ²

Mehraban آadi Peykani ³

¹ PhD student of the Public Management Department, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

² Professor, Innovation & Sustainability Governance Group, Faculty of Governance, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

³ Associate Professor of the Public Management Department, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

10.22034/kps.2026.580329.1274

Abstract

This study seeks to identify the components of transnational knowledge as a means to enhance state–nation relations through a continuum from domestic legitimacy to international credibility, focusing on knowledge policies, requirements, and key actors. The research is applied in purpose and employs a mixed–method design. Data were collected through semi‑structured interviews with 15 experts in public administration, international relations, political science, and public policy, selected via purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data, and a meta‑heuristic modeling approach was further used to construct a systematic model representing the relationships among key variables—such as transnational knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge policies, actor roles, domestic legitimacy, and international credibility—through structural variables and an objective function. Integrating theoretical insights and empirical themes led to the identification of six overarching dimensions shaping transnational state–nation relations: (1) international stakeholders and state legitimacy; (2) global economic integration and competitiveness; (3) cultural, scientific, and media diplomacy; (4) global governance and transnational accountability; (5) international responsiveness to global public interests; and (6) transnational actors and civil society engagement. Together, these dimensions formed a comprehensive network of requirements, actors, and influencing factors for improving state–nation relations. The findings indicate that strengthening state–nation relations requires a shift from purely domestic approaches toward multi‑level and transnational governance. International legitimacy, economic integration, active cultural diplomacy, and engagement with transnational actors constitute the core elements of this transformation.

Keywords

Transnational Knowledge

Knowledge Governance

Domestic Legitimacy

Knowledge Policies

Transnational Actors

Subjects

Knowledge management

Alfi, M. R. (2017 [1396]). Cooperation between state and nation and its impact on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Islamic Revolution Studies, 14(51), 25–50. [in Persian].

Deghati, A., Yaghoubi, N., Kamalian, A. R., Dehghani, M., & Moradi, E. (2020 [1399]). Developing a model for electronic and networked good governance with a futures studies approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Faculty of Management and Economics). [in Persian].

Farhudi Moqaddam, M. R., & Ghavam, A. (2020 [1399]). Incomplete state–nation building: The root of Middle East crises. Politics and International Relations, 4(7), 279–310. [in Persian].

Geraeili Karpi, H., Matlabi, M., Abolfazli, H., & Salehi Farsani, A. (2023 [1402]). Compatibility between elite political culture and good governance: Implications for Iran. Theoretical Policy Research, 18(33). [in Persian].

Hosseini, S. A., Ghasemi, M., Yaghoubi, N., & Salarzehi, H. (2022 [1401]). Explaining and analyzing good governance and proposing a smart governance model for Iran (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Faculty of Management and Economics). [in Persian].

Mohammadi, M. K., Ahmadian, G., Karimi, J., & Ahmadian, Gh. (2019 [1398]). The discourse of democratic confederalism in northern Syria and moving beyond state–nation building (Doctoral dissertation, Razi University, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Department of Political Science). [in Persian].

Al Mokdad, A. (2025). Role of civil society and non-governmental organizations in addressing developmental disparities in the Middle East: Empowering communities for sustainable development. In Unveiling developmental disparities in the Middle East (pp. 93–140). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385467434

Alavian, M., Ghasemi, A., & Rahmani, M. (2022). Obstacles to realizing the paradigm of good urban governance in Iran. Studies of Urban Structure and Function, 9(31), 199–228. https://journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3699_750145

Behjati Asl, S. F., Azimi Dolatabadi, A., & Mollaei Tavani, A. (2021). Analyzing the crises of republicanism on the verge of the formation of the modern nation-state in Iran (Doctoral dissertation, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute).

Bornman, E. (2021). The idea of the South African nation: National versus subnational identification and its implications for national unity. Journal of Nation-Building & Policy Studies, 5(2), 47–74. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.31920/2516-3132/2021/v5n2a3

Farhoudi Moghadam, M. R., & Ghavam, A. (2020). Incomplete state-building: The root of Middle East crises. Politics and International Relations, 4(7), 279–310. http://noo.rs/GBN4w

Hug, F. (2024). Domestic e-commerce promotion through state-managed liberalisation. In China’s free trade agreement strategies (pp. 207–268). Springer.

Sapkota, K. N. (2025). Practices of good governance in Budhanilkantha municipality: Local government initiatives. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 4(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i1.320

Iheduru, O. C. (2004). Black economic power and nation-building in post-apartheid South Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X03004452

Kjaer, A. M. (2023). Governance. John Wiley & Sons.

Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. M. (2012). Size matters: Entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39, 119–139.

Kosmützky, A., & Krücken, G. (2023). Governing research: New forms of competition and cooperation in academia. In University collegiality and the erosion of faculty authority (pp. 31–57). Emerald Publishing.

Laffan, L. (2012). A new way of measuring openness: The open governance index. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/512

Laruffa, F. (2024). Making sense of (post) neoliberalism. Politics & Society, 52(4), 586–629.

Lee‑Geiller, S. (2024). Technology married to good governance and diversity: Explaining e‑participation preparedness in government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123218

Light, P. (2011). Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability. Brookings Institution Press.

McGahan, A. M. (2024). Review of Questioning the entrepreneurial state: Status‑quo, pitfalls, and the need for credible innovation policy, edited by K. Wennberg & C. Sandström.

Meijer, A. J., Lips, M., & Chen, K. (2019). Open governance: A new paradigm for understanding urban governance in an information age. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2019.00003

Rosenberg, J. (2024). The empire of civil society: A critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.

Sarpong, S. Y., & Bein, M. A. (2021). Effects of good governance, sustainable development and aid on quality of life: Evidence from sub‑Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 33(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12488

Singh, A. (2023). A theoretical understanding of governance and good governance. Vidya – A Journal of Gujarat University, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.47413/vidya.v2i1.125

Thapa, G. B., Campbell, J. R., & Sharma, J. (2025). The Nepali path to federalism: Making good governance in Nepal’s federal structure. In Mapping governance innovations (pp. 167–187). Routledge.

Vilone, L. (2020). Good governance and transparency. Giuristi: Revista de Derecho Corporativo, 1(2), 343–353. https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/giuristi/article/view/28

Weiss, T. G., & Thakur, R. (2010). Global governance and the UN: An unfinished journey. Indiana University Press.