A Prospectively Validated K-Means Framework for Demand Tiering and Acquisition Prioritisation in Academic Library Collections

Document Type : Original Research Manuscripts

Authors

1 Associate Professor in the Department of Library and Information Science, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.

2 Librarian, Gopal Krishna Gokhale College, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.

10.22034/kps.2026.595592.1296
Abstract
Though academic libraries have access to wide-ranging circulation data‚ collection decisions are still typically based on descriptive use reports‚ which have shown an inability to identify sustained demand titles‚ or anticipate demand for titles․ A data-driven approach to create ordered demand tiers‚ and an ordered acquisition priorities list‚ from standard circulation data is proposed and validated․ The circulation data for the period June 2024 to June 2026 was collected from the Knowledge Resource Centre‚ SNDT Women's University‚ Pune․ A total of 4984 transactions on 2615 titles and 915 borrowers were analyzed․ Five title-level circulation indicators were employed: total circulation transactions‚ unique borrowers‚ active months‚ transaction per active month‚ and renewals․ The consecutive design involved computing features on the date range of January to December 2025 based on 1‚626 titles‚ and testing prediction on January to April 2026 circulation levels․ We compared K-Means clustering with Ward hierarchical clustering and DBSCAN using four internal indices and a stability test based on 30 random initialisations․ A composite demand score was calculated for the indicators after normalization using four weighting schemes․ However‚ performance of the composite score was similar to a simple transaction-count baseline․ Therefore‚ the main benefit of the composite score was its use of an interpretable tier structure‚ rather than improved ranking performance․ It provides a framework for reproducible acquisition prioritization‚ duplicate-copy planning‚ and identifying underused holdings․

Keywords

Subjects

Asminah, A. (2022). Sistem penentuan penambahan koleksi buku di perpustakaan menggunakan metode k-means clustering. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 4(1), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v4i1.2383
Badanina, N. D., & Sudakov, V. A. (2022). Driver clustering according to the ratio of dangerous behavior using machine learning algorithms. Modelling and Data Analysis, 12(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17759/mda.2022120101
Galyani-Moghaddam, G., & Taheri, P. (2021). Public library circulation records: What do they reveal about users’ reading preferences? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620949643
Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
Jain, A. K. (2010). Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(8), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011
Kalbande, D., Yuvaraj, M., Verma, M. K., A., S., Suradkar, P., & Chavan, S. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A study on librarians’ perspectives in India. Open Information Science, 8(1), 20240006. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2024-0006
Kumar, P., & Jyoti. (2024). Reshaping the library landscape: Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence in libraries. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 9(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijlsit.2024.005
Monika, W., Nasution, A. H., Syam, F. A., & Wijesundara, C. (2025). Clustering of library’s patron behavior using machine learning. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v16i1.19680
Narendra, A. P., Dewi, C., Gunawan, L. S., & Ardi, A. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence implementation in library information systems: Current trends and future studies. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, 12(03), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2196888824300023
Roy, P. (2025). Big data analytics in university libraries on today’s librarianship decision-making: A disruptive innovation perspective. IFLA Journal, 51(4), 1013–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251318753
Safira, W. E., & Mohammed, S. (2026). Supporting academic library collection decisions using k-means–based book recommendation. Artificial Intelligence in Educational Decision Sciences, 1(2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.66053/aieds.v1i2.25
Sinulingga, N., Sarif, M. I., Ramadhani, N. A., Nurfebia, K., & Sulistia, F. Y. (2025). Penerapan algoritma k-means clustering untuk mengetahui pola peminjaman buku di perpustakaan Universitas Imelda Medan. Jurnal Komputer Teknologi Informasi Sistem Informasi (JUKTISI), 4(3), 1552–1560. https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v4i3.707
Tamba, S. P., Batubara, M. D., Purba, W., Sihombing, M., Mulia Siregar, V. M., & Banjarnahor, J. (2019). Book data grouping in libraries using the k-means clustering method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1230(1), 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1230/1/012074
Tanjung, M. I., & Sriani, S. (2025). Clustering library loan books using k-means clustering. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(1), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i1.1037
Walker, K. W., & Jiang, Z. (2019). Application of adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) in demand-driven acquisition (DDA) prediction: A machine-learning approach. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.013
Zhang, X., Zang, L., Bai, W., & Liu, H. (2024). Big data analysis and application of library information resources. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 20241212. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1212

  • Receive Date 12 March 2026
  • Revise Date 21 April 2026
  • Accept Date 19 May 2026